{"id":12612,"date":"2026-08-30T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-08-30T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/?p=12612"},"modified":"2026-08-30T08:00:00","modified_gmt":"2026-08-30T08:00:00","slug":"sea-vs-rail-freight-better-forklifts-china-europe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/fr\/sea-vs-rail-freight-better-forklifts-china-europe\/","title":{"rendered":"Fret maritime vs ferroviaire : lequel est le meilleur pour les chariots \u00e9l\u00e9vateurs de Chine vers l'Europe ?"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>article img, .entry-content img, .post-content img, .wp-block-image img, figure img, p img {max-width:100% !important; height:auto !important;}figure { max-width:100%; }img.top-image-square {width:280px !important; height:280px !important; object-fit:cover !important;border-radius:12px; box-shadow:0 2px 12px rgba(0,0,0,0.10);}@media (max-width:600px) {img.top-image-square { width:100% !important; height:auto !important; max-height:300px; }p:has(> img.top-image-square) { float:none !important; margin:0 auto 15px auto !important; text-align:center; }}.claim { background-color:#fff4f4; border-left:4px solid #e63946; border-radius:10px; padding:20px 24px; margin:24px 0; font-family:system-ui,sans-serif; line-height:1.6; position:relative; box-shadow:0 2px 6px rgba(0,0,0,0.03); }.claim-true { background-color:#eafaf0; border-left-color:#2ecc71; }.claim-icon { display:inline-block; font-size:18px; color:#e63946; margin-right:10px; vertical-align:middle; }.claim-true .claim-icon { color:#2ecc71; }.claim-title { display:flex; align-items:center; font-weight:600; font-size:16px; color:#222; }.claim-label { margin-left:auto; font-size:12px; background-color:#e63946; color:#fff; padding:3px 10px; border-radius:12px; font-weight:bold; }.claim-true .claim-label { background-color:#2ecc71; }.claim-explanation { margin-top:8px; color:#555; font-size:15px; }.claim-pair { margin:32px 0; }<\/style>\n<p style=\"float: right; margin-left: 15px; margin-bottom: 15px;\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" style=\"max-width:100%;\" src=\"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/v2-article-1786576935964-1.jpg\" alt=\"Comparing sea and rail freight options for shipping forklifts from China to Europe (ID#1)\" class=\"top-image-square\">\n<\/p>\n<p>Choosing between sea vs rail freight for forklifts from China to Europe confuses many buyers. Pick wrong, and I have watched importers lose weeks, money, and customer trust. Our team at MBMLOG in Zhengzhou solves exactly this problem daily.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sea freight is better for forklift shipments from China to Europe when cost matters most and delivery dates are flexible. Rail freight is better when speed counts, cutting transit to 15\u201325 days versus 35\u201350 days by sea, at roughly 2\u20133 times the base container cost.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>That short answer hides important details. Your order size, battery type, destination city, and urgency all change the math. Let me walk you through each factor, one by one.<\/p>\n<h2>How Do Sea and Rail Freight Compare in Cost for Shipping Forklifts to Europe?<\/h2>\n<p>Last quarter, our team quoted the same three-forklift shipment two ways for a Polish dealer. The rail quote was nearly double the ocean rate. He still chose rail. Here is why the numbers are not as simple as they look.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sea freight typically costs $1,500\u2013$4,500 per container to Europe, while rail runs $4,500\u2013$14,000 depending on the lane and season. Sea holds a 30% to 100% door-to-door price advantage, but rail can win on total landed cost for inland European destinations.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"max-width:100%; height:auto;\" src=\"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/v2-article-1786576942947-2.jpg\" alt=\"Cost comparison chart of sea versus rail freight rates for forklift shipments to Europe (ID#2)\" title=\"Sea vs Rail Cost\"><\/p>\n<p>The base freight rate is only the starting point. When we build a quotation for a forklift importer, we look at the full door-to-door delivery cost, not just the port-to-port or terminal-to-terminal number. That is where the picture gets interesting.<\/p>\n<h3>Base Rates Side by Side<\/h3>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Cost Factor<\/th>\n<th>Sea Freight<\/th>\n<th>Rail Freight<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Typical container rate<\/td>\n<td>$1,500\u2013$4,500<\/td>\n<td>$4,500\u2013$14,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Relative base cost<\/td>\n<td>Lowest available<\/td>\n<td>Roughly 2\u20133x sea<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Price stability<\/td>\n<td>Volatile, congestion-driven<\/td>\n<td>More stable in recent years<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Door-to-door advantage<\/td>\n<td>30\u2013100% cheaper on most lanes<\/td>\n<td>Competitive for inland hubs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>The Inland Delivery Factor<\/h3>\n<p>Here is the detail many buyers miss. If your warehouse sits in Prague, Warsaw, or another inland European hub, rail can actually produce a lower total landed cost. Why? Because sea freight lands your container in Rotterdam or Hamburg, and heavy-haul trucking from a coastal port to Central Europe is expensive. Forklifts are <a href=\"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/?p=11633\">heavy machinery transport<\/a> by definition, so that final trucking leg costs more than it would for light cargo. Rail terminals in Poland, Czechia, and Germany often sit much closer to your final destination.<\/p>\n<h3>Freight Rate Is Not Landed Cost<\/h3>\n<p>We always remind customers that the cheapest freight option is not always the cheapest business decision. Duties, destination handling, trucking, and storage all stack on top. A <a href=\"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/?p=12232\">transparent quotation<\/a> covering all of these is the only fair way to compare sea vs rail. In our experience, a rail quote that looks 2x more expensive can shrink to a 20\u201330% premium once inland trucking is added to the ocean option.<\/p>\n<div class=\"claim-pair\">\n<div class=\"claim claim-true\">\n<div class=\"claim-title\"><span class=\"claim-icon\">\u2714<\/span> Rail freight can beat sea freight on total landed cost for forklifts delivered to inland European cities like [Prague or Warsaw](https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/?p=12312) <span class=\"claim-label\">True<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"claim-explanation\">Rail eliminates expensive heavy-haul trucking from coastal ports like Rotterdam, so the door-to-door total can favor rail even when the base container rate is higher.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"claim claim-false\">\n<div class=\"claim-title\"><span class=\"claim-icon\">\u2718<\/span> The container freight rate tells you the full cost of shipping a forklift to Europe <span class=\"claim-label\">False<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"claim-explanation\">Destination handling, customs duties, inland trucking, and storage charges can add substantially to the base rate, which is why landed-cost comparison matters more than the freight quote alone.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Which Option Offers Faster Transit Time for My Forklift Shipment to Europe?<\/h2>\n<p>A German rental company once called us in a panic. Their client&#39;s warehouse opening was six weeks away, and ocean transit alone would eat five of them. We rebooked the shipment onto a <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Belt_and_Road_Initiative\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">New Silk Road rail service<\/a> <sup id=\"ref-1\"><a href=\"#footnote-1\" class=\"footnote-ref\">1<\/a><\/sup> and saved the project. Speed is where rail truly earns its premium.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Rail freight from China to Europe takes 15\u201325 days, while sea freight takes 35\u201350 days on most routes. Rail is roughly twice as fast, and its schedule stability exceeds 92% on-time performance, making it the clear winner for time-sensitive forklift shipments.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"max-width:100%; height:auto;\" src=\"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/v2-article-1786576947037-3.jpg\" alt=\"Transit time comparison showing rail freight is faster than sea freight for forklift delivery (ID#3)\" title=\"Faster Transit Time\"><\/p>\n<p>Transit times matter more for forklifts than for most cargo. A forklift is capital equipment. Until it arrives, it earns nothing. Every extra day in transit is a day of delayed revenue, delayed warehouse launches, or delayed rental income. That is the hidden cost most freight comparisons ignore.<\/p>\n<h3>Typical Transit Windows<\/h3>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Route Stage<\/th>\n<th>Sea Freight<\/th>\n<th>Rail Freight<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Main leg transit<\/td>\n<td>25\u201345+ days<\/td>\n<td>15\u201322 days<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Longer routings<\/td>\n<td>Up to 35\u201350+ days<\/td>\n<td>16\u201325 days<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Schedule reliability<\/td>\n<td>Exposed to port congestion and weather<\/td>\n<td>Over 92% on-time on major corridors<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Disruption risk<\/td>\n<td>Red Sea diversions have stretched windows<\/td>\n<td>Fixed departures, land-based routing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Why Reliability Matters as Much as Speed<\/h3>\n<p>Speed is only half the story. Supply chain reliability is the other half. Ongoing Red Sea disruptions have forced many vessels around the Cape of Good Hope, adding one to two weeks of uncertainty on some sailings. Rail avoids that entirely. Fixed departure schedules on the China\u2013Europe corridor make arrival dates far easier to plan around.<\/p>\n<h3>The Downtime Math<\/h3>\n<p>Think of it this way. If a forklift is needed to open a facility, fulfill a contract, or replace a broken machine, shaving 10\u201320 days off transit has real business value. We often help buyers calculate this. If one forklift generates even modest daily rental or operational value, three saved weeks can easily exceed the rail premium. For urgent-but-not-air-freight-urgent shipments, rail is the practical middle ground. Air freight for a multi-ton forklift is rarely economical, so rail fills that gap well.<\/p>\n<div class=\"claim-pair\">\n<div class=\"claim claim-true\">\n<div class=\"claim-title\"><span class=\"claim-icon\">\u2714<\/span> Rail freight from China to Europe is roughly twice as fast as sea freight on the same corridor <span class=\"claim-label\">True<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"claim-explanation\">Rail typically completes the journey in 15\u201325 days, while sea freight commonly takes 35\u201350 days, especially with recent route diversions adding time to ocean sailings.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"claim claim-false\">\n<div class=\"claim-title\"><span class=\"claim-icon\">\u2718<\/span> Sea freight schedules are just as predictable as rail schedules <span class=\"claim-label\">False<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"claim-explanation\">Ocean freight is more exposed to port congestion, weather, and geopolitical rerouting, while rail services on the China\u2013Europe corridor report over 92% on-time performance.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Is Rail Freight Safer Than Sea Freight for Transporting Lithium Battery Forklifts?<\/h2>\n<p>Before any lithium battery forklift leaves a factory we work with, our team checks the battery documentation line by line. One missing <a href=\"https:\/\/unece.org\/transport\/dangerous-goods\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">UN38.3 test summary<\/a> <sup id=\"ref-2\"><a href=\"#footnote-2\" class=\"footnote-ref\">2<\/a><\/sup> can strand a container at the port. Safety for battery-powered equipment is not just about the journey. It starts with the paperwork.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Neither mode is automatically safer. Both sea and rail must follow Class 9 dangerous goods regulations for lithium battery forklifts. Sea offers steadier transit conditions, while rail exposes batteries to extreme temperature swings and border-crossing shocks, so proper preparation matters more than the mode itself.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"max-width:100%; height:auto;\" src=\"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/v2-article-1786576948853-4.jpg\" alt=\"Lithium battery forklift safety considerations for sea and rail freight shipping methods (ID#4)\" title=\"Battery Shipping Safety\"><\/p>\n<p>This question deserves a careful answer, because the marketing from both sides oversimplifies it. High-capacity lithium-ion battery packs classify electric forklifts as Class 9 dangerous goods. That classification applies whether your container moves on a vessel or a train. Carrier acceptance, packaging, labeling, and documentation requirements exist on both routes.<\/p>\n<h3>The Physical Stress Comparison<\/h3>\n<p>The two modes stress cargo differently. Here is what we have learned coordinating heavy equipment loading and securing for both:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Temperature.<\/strong> The Eurasian land bridge crosses regions ranging from -40\u00b0C to +40\u00b0C. That thermal stress can affect lithium batteries, and some shipments require specialized insulation that ocean transit typically does not need.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Vibration and shock.<\/strong> Rail routes involve gauge changes at borders like China\u2013Kazakhstan and Belarus\u2013Poland. Containers are lifted and transferred, subjecting heavy machinery to higher mechanical G-force shocks. Ocean transit produces steady, low-frequency vibration instead.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Securing requirements.<\/strong> A multi-ton forklift that shifts inside a container is dangerous on either mode. Proper blocking, bracing, and weight distribution protect the mast, hydraulics, and battery pack. We coordinate loading directly with factories for exactly this reason.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h3>Documentation Is the Real Safety Layer<\/h3>\n<p>Beyond physical handling, paperwork determines whether your shipment moves at all. Rail offers one genuine advantage here: a unified CIM\/SMGS consignment note covers multiple borders with a single legal document. Sea shipments into the EU now face the more complex <a href=\"https:\/\/taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu\/customs-4\/customs-security\/import-control-system-2-ics2_en\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">maritime-specific ICS2 customs filing<\/a> <sup id=\"ref-3\"><a href=\"#footnote-3\" class=\"footnote-ref\">3<\/a><\/sup> requirements. Either way, we verify battery specifications, dangerous goods declarations, and carrier acceptance before cargo reaches the terminal. Catching problems in China is cheap. Catching them at a European border is not.<\/p>\n<h2>Should I Choose Sea or Rail Freight Based on My Order Volume and Container Needs?<\/h2>\n<p>One trade-off we weigh on almost every quotation: does this buyer&#39;s volume justify a Full Container Load, and does the timeline justify rail? A dealer ordering eight forklifts thinks differently from a warehouse buying one urgent replacement. Volume and urgency together decide the answer.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Choose sea freight for full container loads of multiple forklifts with flexible timelines, since it minimizes cost per unit. Choose rail for smaller, urgent orders of one to three forklifts where faster replenishment justifies the premium. LCL consolidation works on both modes for partial loads.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"max-width:100%; height:auto;\" src=\"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/v2-article-1786576951858-5.jpg\" alt=\"Choosing sea or rail freight based on forklift order volume and container requirements (ID#5)\" title=\"Order Volume Guide\"><\/p>\n<p>Order profile is the most practical way to make this decision. After handling everything from single-unit shipments to full dealer stock orders, we see clear patterns in what works.<\/p>\n<h3>Decision Guide by Shipment Profile<\/h3>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Your Situation<\/th>\n<th>Recommended Mode<\/th>\n<th>Why<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Dealer stock order, 4+ forklifts, FCL<\/td>\n<td>Sea<\/td>\n<td>Lowest cost per unit; inventory buffer absorbs transit time<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Warehouse launch on a deadline<\/td>\n<td>Rail<\/td>\n<td>15\u201325 day transit protects the project schedule<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Urgent replacement for a broken machine<\/td>\n<td>Rail<\/td>\n<td>Downtime cost outweighs the freight premium<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Forklifts + batteries + chargers + spares<\/td>\n<td>Sea (consolidated FCL)<\/td>\n<td>Multi-supplier consolidation maximizes container utilization<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Oversized masts or heavy-duty models<\/td>\n<td>Sea<\/td>\n<td>Project cargo infrastructure handles dimensions rail containers cannot<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Inland delivery to Central Europe<\/td>\n<td>Rail<\/td>\n<td>Shorter final trucking leg improves landed cost<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Container Utilization Changes Everything<\/h3>\n<p>A 40HQ container can often carry multiple compact electric forklifts plus spare parts, chargers, and batteries in the remaining space. When we consolidate cargo from several factories into one Full Container Load, the logistics cost per forklift drops sharply. That efficiency favors sea freight, where the per-container rate is lowest. If your order fills a container and your inventory planning allows a 35\u201350 day window, sea is usually the right call.<\/p>\n<h3>When Volume Does Not Decide It<\/h3>\n<p>Rail becomes attractive for tighter replenishment cycles. Many European dealers now run an inventory-threshold strategy: sea freight covers baseline stock, and rail handles fast top-ups when demand spikes. This kind of intermodal logistics thinking, rather than loyalty to one mode, is where the market is heading. Rail also carries a smaller carbon footprint per ton-kilometer than sea freight, which matters to buyers with sustainability targets. One caution: oversized forklift masts or heavy-duty models may exceed standard rail container dimensions, so we always confirm equipment dimensions before booking.<\/p>\n<div class=\"claim-pair\">\n<div class=\"claim claim-true\">\n<div class=\"claim-title\"><span class=\"claim-icon\">\u2714<\/span> Filling a full container with forklifts, batteries, and spare parts significantly lowers the shipping cost per unit <span class=\"claim-label\">True<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"claim-explanation\">Container rates are charged per box, not per item, so consolidating multiple units and accessories into one FCL spreads the fixed freight cost across more cargo.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"claim claim-false\">\n<div class=\"claim-title\"><span class=\"claim-icon\">\u2718<\/span> Rail freight can handle any forklift size that fits on a ship <span class=\"claim-label\">False<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"claim-explanation\">Sea freight offers better project cargo infrastructure for oversized masts and heavy-duty models, which can exceed standard rail container dimensions and handling limits.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p>Sea wins on cost. Rail wins on speed and predictability. Match the mode to your urgency, volume, and destination, and your forklifts arrive on budget and on time.<\/p>\n<h2>Footnotes<\/h2>\n<p><span id=\"footnote-1\"><br \/>\n1. Provides context on the infrastructure project facilitating rail freight between China and Europe. <a href=\"#ref-1\" class=\"footnote-backref\">\u21a9\ufe0e<\/a><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span id=\"footnote-2\"><br \/>\n2. The United Nations authority on the transport of dangerous goods and battery testing standards. <a href=\"#ref-2\" class=\"footnote-backref\">\u21a9\ufe0e<\/a><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span id=\"footnote-3\"><br \/>\n3. Official European Commission page detailing the Import Control System 2 for maritime cargo security. <a href=\"#ref-3\" class=\"footnote-backref\">\u21a9\ufe0e<\/a><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n  \"mainEntity\": [\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Sea vs Rail Freight: Which Is Better for Forklifts from China to Europe?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Sea freight is better for forklift shipments from China to Europe when cost matters most and delivery dates are flexible. Rail freight is better when speed counts, cutting transit to 15\u201325 days versus 35\u201350 days by sea, at roughly 2\u20133 times the base container cost.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"How Do Sea and Rail Freight Compare in Cost for Shipping Forklifts to Europe?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Sea freight typically costs $1,500\u2013$4,500 per container to Europe, while rail runs $4,500\u2013$14,000 depending on the lane and season. Sea holds a 30% to 100% door-to-door price advantage, but rail can win on total landed cost for inland European destinations.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Which Option Offers Faster Transit Time for My Forklift Shipment to Europe?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Rail freight from China to Europe takes 15\u201325 days, while sea freight takes 35\u201350 days on most routes. Rail is roughly twice as fast, and its schedule stability exceeds 92% on-time performance, making it the clear winner for time-sensitive forklift shipments.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Is Rail Freight Safer Than Sea Freight for Transporting Lithium Battery Forklifts?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Neither mode is automatically safer. Both sea and rail must follow Class 9 dangerous goods regulations for lithium battery forklifts. Sea offers steadier transit conditions, while rail exposes batteries to extreme temperature swings and border-crossing shocks, so proper preparation matters more than the mode itself.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Should I Choose Sea or Rail Freight Based on My Order Volume and Container Needs?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Choose sea freight for full container loads of multiple forklifts with flexible timelines, since it minimizes cost per unit. Choose rail for smaller, urgent orders of one to three forklifts where faster replenishment justifies the premium. LCL consolidation works on both modes for partial loads.\"\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n[\n  {\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"ClaimReview\",\n    \"url\": \"\",\n    \"claimReviewed\": \"Rail freight can beat sea freight on total landed cost for forklifts delivered to inland European cities like [Prague or Warsaw](https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/?p=12312)\",\n    \"author\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n      \"name\": \"Article Author\"\n    },\n    \"reviewRating\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Rating\",\n      \"ratingValue\": 5,\n      \"bestRating\": 5,\n      \"worstRating\": 1,\n      \"alternateName\": \"True\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"ClaimReview\",\n    \"url\": \"\",\n    \"claimReviewed\": \"The container freight rate tells you the full cost of shipping a forklift to Europe\",\n    \"author\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n      \"name\": \"Article Author\"\n    },\n    \"reviewRating\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Rating\",\n      \"ratingValue\": 1,\n      \"bestRating\": 5,\n      \"worstRating\": 1,\n      \"alternateName\": \"False\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"ClaimReview\",\n    \"url\": \"\",\n    \"claimReviewed\": \"Rail freight from China to Europe is roughly twice as fast as sea freight on the same corridor\",\n    \"author\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n      \"name\": \"Article Author\"\n    },\n    \"reviewRating\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Rating\",\n      \"ratingValue\": 5,\n      \"bestRating\": 5,\n      \"worstRating\": 1,\n      \"alternateName\": \"True\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"ClaimReview\",\n    \"url\": \"\",\n    \"claimReviewed\": \"Sea freight schedules are just as predictable as rail schedules\",\n    \"author\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n      \"name\": \"Article Author\"\n    },\n    \"reviewRating\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Rating\",\n      \"ratingValue\": 1,\n      \"bestRating\": 5,\n      \"worstRating\": 1,\n      \"alternateName\": \"False\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"ClaimReview\",\n    \"url\": \"\",\n    \"claimReviewed\": \"Filling a full container with forklifts, batteries, and spare parts significantly lowers the shipping cost per unit\",\n    \"author\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n      \"name\": \"Article Author\"\n    },\n    \"reviewRating\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Rating\",\n      \"ratingValue\": 5,\n      \"bestRating\": 5,\n      \"worstRating\": 1,\n      \"alternateName\": \"True\"\n    }\n  },\n  {\n    \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n    \"@type\": \"ClaimReview\",\n    \"url\": \"\",\n    \"claimReviewed\": \"Rail freight can handle any forklift size that fits on a ship\",\n    \"author\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n      \"name\": \"Article Author\"\n    },\n    \"reviewRating\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Rating\",\n      \"ratingValue\": 1,\n      \"bestRating\": 5,\n      \"worstRating\": 1,\n      \"alternateName\": \"False\"\n    }\n  }\n]\n<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Fret maritime vs ferroviaire pour les chariots \u00e9l\u00e9vateurs de Chine vers l'Europe : le maritime permet d'\u00e9conomiser jusqu'\u00e0 100% sur les co\u00fbts, le ferroviaire r\u00e9duit le transit \u00e0 seulement 15\u201325 jours. Comparez les deux pour faire le bon choix.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":12607,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12612","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-import-electrical-forklift-from-china"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12612","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12612"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12612\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12883,"href":"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12612\/revisions\/12883"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12607"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12612"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12612"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mbmlog.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12612"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}